Featured Publications

Intellectual Property and Technology: Alert - November 17, 2009

Governor Patrick’s Office of Consumer Af¬fairs and Business Regulation announced on November 4, 2009, that it has filed the final Massachusetts ID Theft Regulation, also known as 201 CMR 17:00. The goal of Regulation 201 is to help combat the loss of personal information; the most significant change is a require¬ment that covered entities amend existing agreements that they have with third-party service providers to include language requiring these providers to implement and main¬tain “appropriate” security measures for the protection of personal information.

More

Government Contracts: Alert - November 12, 2009

On November 30, 2009, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. United States ex rel. Wilson, a qui tam action brought under the False Claims Act (FCA) and appealed from a Fourth Circuit decision. The Court will use the case to resolve a split among the circuits over the scope of the FCA's "public disclosure" bar. A decision affirming the Fourth Circuit could increase qui tam litigation against any organization that does business with, or receives federal money through, federal, state and local governmental entities – and would further expand the reach of the FCA to any state or local program involving the use of federal funds.

More

Search Our Library

Search

  • Print Article
  • Email this page to a friend
  • Print Newsletter / Alert
Aviation: Centerline
Newsletter - February 2007
 
In this Issue...
Department of Transportation Proposal Regarding Charter Operations
 
 February 2, 2007
 
Jonathan Epstein - Washington
Judith R. "Judy" Nemsick- New York

As a result of the same accidents that triggered the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to issue new guidance on operational control of Part 135 charter operators, the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) recently issued a proposal to require certain information be provided to charter customers about which entity is actually conducting a particular flight.

 

The Proposal

The DOT, which grants economic authority to air carriers, has issued an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) requesting comment on questions concerning recommendations of the National Transportation Safety Board that at the time of contracting, on-demand air taxis provide their customers with the following:

• the name of the company with operational control of the flight

• any “doing business as” names contained in such company’s Operational Specifications

• the name of the aircraft owner

• the name of any broker involved in arranging the flight

In addition, customers should be updated as to any changes in the foregoing information. The DOT considers adequate ownership and operator information essential for consumers to be afforded the opportunity to make informed decisions about their flight choices.

 

Current DOT Restrictions

The DOT already regulates charter management arrangements involving the use of “doing business as” or where the owner takes an active role in marketing, booking, or billing and collecting from charter customers. In particular, certain activities may be considered “deceptive trade practices” or acting as an indirect air carrier without proper authority. The DOT Office of Aviation Enforcement Proceedings has actively investigated and fined companies that violate these rules, and apparently authored this proposal.

The DOT is accepting comments on the proposal questions until March 27, 2007. For procedural reasons it will probably be many months before regulations are enacted. Nevertheless, charter operators and owners should be aware of the increased focus of both the DOT and FAA on these issues.

 

For more information, e-mail Jonathan Epstein or Judith Nemsick at jonathan.epstein@hklaw.com or judith.nemsick@hklaw.com, respectively, or call toll free, 1-888-688-8500.

Related Practices