Winter 2014 (Vol. 43-2)
Procedural Approaches to Filling Gaps in the Administrative Record in Bid Protests Before the U.S. Court of Federal Claims
Public Contract Law Journal
This article addresses the supplementation of the administrative record in bid protests at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (COFC). Unlike recent judicial decisions and articles, however, this Article’s focus is not when the administrative record should be supplemented or with what information. Instead, its purpose is to explore how the administrative record should be supplemented as a matter of procedure.
Related Insights
Flooding the Zone Does Not Work for Opioid Plaintiffs in Maine

Podcast - Parting Thoughts: Be a "Peddler of Common Sense"
A Tale of Two Rulings: Serta, Mitel Cases Remind Why Contract Language Matters in Debt Documents
Holland & Knight and SECond Opinions Welcome Peter Hardy
Planting the Seeds of Corruption
DOJ Forsakes Defending the ALJ Process Against Article II Challenges
Rescission of the Fintiv Guidance Memorandum, and What Comes Next
Former MoviePass Executive Consents and Pleads Guilty in Parallel SEC and DOJ Cases
Florida District Court Clarifies “Communicating with” Consumers Via Email Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act