June 29, 2017
Highest and Best Use Valuation Not Required For Cramdown Purposes
Client Alert
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, has held that a lender’s collateral need not be valued at its highest and best use when determining whether a Chapter 11 debtor’s plan of reorganization should be crammed down over the lender’s objection.
READ: Highest and Best Use Valuation Not Required For Cramdown Purposes
Related Insights

Should Users of 23andMe Delete Their Profile Following Company’s Bankruptcy?
A Tale of Two Rulings: Serta, Mitel Cases Remind Why Contract Language Matters in Debt Documents
Comparing and Contrasting Domestic and Cross-Border Aviation Finance Transactions