NetChoice Decision Hints at Key AI Questions Ahead

Intellectual Property attorney Daniel Barsky wrote an article for IPWatchdog about the potential implications of the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in Moody v. NetChoice on the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and free speech, the First Amendment and defamation. Mr. Barsky explains the court's analysis assumes that a human is involved in the creation, curating or editing of content, raising questions about the First Amendment protections for works created or edited by AI. The article also discusses the applicability of Florida and Texas laws regulating content moderation on social media platforms to AI companies and highlights the need for a comprehensive AI legal framework in the United States.

READ: NetChoice Decision Hints at Key AI Questions Ahead